I had to switch to the main unit because the laptop could't load anything. Damn bloody laptop. You might as well go and die...

Took my history essay outlines from Loh yesterday. I don't know whether he gave constructive comments, but i thought i might as well head it for the good of my essays.

Try and review the comments he gave. It's all saying the same things, which means that I hardly learn from mistakes..

Q: Examine how colonial policies towards nationalism in SEA contributed to the radicalisation of nationalist movements.
His comments: "Shakirah, you need to raise the level of your analysis. Moreover, your substantiation requires improvement. Try to establish connections between your ideas/points and the content you have learnt. Also, don't speculate, and don't make value judgement."

Q: Do you agree that a lack of strong leadership was the most critical problem for pre-war nationalism in SEA?
His comments: "Shakirah, you have strong ideas here but have been limited by your lack of good supporting evidence. The examples given were either not good ones to illustrate your points, or were mainly mentioned and not elaborated on."

Q: "While the Japanese claimed equality with the Asian nations, they did not regard them as their equals". How far do you agree that this was the reason why the Jap occupiers quicky alienated nationalist movements in SEA?
"Shakirah, your answer begins reasonably well, but then lapses largely into narrative which doesn't quite address the question. Do be mindful of the need for consistent argumentation throughout - topic sentences will help. Keep working hard!"

Q: The impact of the Jap Occupation on nationalism in Southeast Asia would not have been that great if not for the actions of the indigenous nationalist leaders." Critically examine the above statement.
His comments: "Shakirah, this is a good effort from you. However, you'll need to beef up your elaboration. Moreover, do consider the role of indigenous leaders besides resistance, to achieve a more balanced answer.